Curia Session V - 194 BC

All Senatorial Sessions held here
User avatar
Allectus Fabius Maximus
Posts: 506
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:03 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Allectus Fabius Maximus »

AYE
Allecto
Senator - Patrician
Naval Legate - Laconian War 194
Propraetor of Hispania Citerior 193
User avatar
Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo Hispanicus
Posts: 511
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 4:02 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo Hispanicus »

Nay.
User avatar
Proculus Lucius Regulus
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 6:25 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Proculus Lucius Regulus »

This bill stipulates provinces must set aside 250,000 denarii. Knowing from my term as Propraetor of Sardinia et Corsica, that is the entire yearly revenue of that province. Rome has a treasury for this exact purpose, and providing for the provinces out of the treasury would not lock away one million denarii that could not be spent on other things.

I must vote NAY.
Starfish, but you could probably already tell from the stupid shit I've written above this signature
Postumus Caesonius Tacitus
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 3:48 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Postumus Caesonius Tacitus »

nay by proxy
Marcus Aurelius Cotta
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:13 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Marcus Aurelius Cotta »

Aye
He is a Consul of Rome
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 4238
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 7:11 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by admin »

The motion does not prove particularly popular with the NPC senators
User avatar
Marcus Silvius Pastor
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:27 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Marcus Silvius Pastor »

Nay by proxy.
User avatar
Amulius Valerius Marius
Posts: 522
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 11:06 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Amulius Valerius Marius »

Aye
Hastati
User avatar
Gaius Cassius Vecellinus
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 12:49 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Gaius Cassius Vecellinus »

Vote tally for the LEX DE PROVINCIIS CUSTODIENDIS (Law for the Guarding of Provinces)

For the motion (4):
Allectus Fabius Maximus
Amulius Valerius Marius
Gaius Cassius Vecellinus
Marcus Aurelius Cotta

Against/Abstaining (9):
Gaius Claudius Nero
Gaius Quinctilius Varus
Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo
Hostus Lucretius Tricipitinus
Marcus Decius Bellicus
Marcus Silvius Pastor
Postumus Caesonius Tacitus
Proculus Lucius Regulus
Titus Furius Pavo


Absent from the Senate (1):
Gaius Porcius Cato

The nays have it and the motion fails.

The Consul rises.

Conscript fathers,

The Senate has spoken.

During the early stages of the voting I was presented a motion by Gaius Claudius Nero which, I believe, has significant merit. The motion that he proposes is the following:
LEX PRO DEFENSIONE PROVINCIARUM (Law for Provincial Defence)
Sponsor: Gaius Claudius Nero

RECOGNIZING the need to preserve the treasury of the Republic, while also ensuring the safety of the provinces of Hispania is maintained;

Be it enacted by the Senate of the Roman Republic in the Curia Hostilia assembled,
I. The defences of the provinces of Hispania will each be limited to 1 Socii legion in times of peace, and 2 in times of war, formal or informal.
II. An informal war would constitute an incursion by a external threat into Republican, or Republican allied lands, without a declaration of war.
III. The Promagistrates assigned to govern the provinces of Hispania will, as per the Imperium granted to them, have the right to conduct diplomacy, warfare and barter with the tribes neighboring their province, provided it is for the betterment of the province and the Republic as a whole.
IV. In the event of a threat to the provinces that are outside the means of the Promagistrates to effectively combat on their own, a Consul or non-governing Proconsul will be elected to lead an army raised from Rome to fight and eliminate the threat. The Promagistrate may join this army to support the war effort with their forces.
V. The present law will take effect on the consular year of 193BC onwards.

Written into the annals in the consular year 194BC of Gaius Cassius Vecellinus and Titus Furius Pavo
I have taken the liberty of adjusting the formatting to the one we have grown used to during this Consular year; I ask Senator Gaius Claudius Nero to confirm that the above accurately reflects his draft proposal and intentions.

I yield the floor to debate.
Civis romanus sum
User avatar
Marcus Decius Bellicus
Posts: 1128
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:44 pm

Re: Curia Session V - 194 BC

Post by Marcus Decius Bellicus »

The Proxy rises

"Consul, let this issue go, how many times must it be defeated?"
He is a proconsul of Rome.
Post Reply