Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

All Senatorial Sessions held here
Postumus Caesonius Tacitus
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2019 3:48 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Postumus Caesonius Tacitus »

Senator Caesonius Tacitus's proxy is currently just remaining in his seat in stunned silence.
User avatar
Gaius Quinctilius Varus
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:39 am
Location: What stands in the way becomes the way.

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Gaius Quinctilius Varus »

Quinctilius Varus was utterly shocked by the impunity which Pavo's proxy exhibited. Recognizing that a call to vote was made as the Censor's response was awaited he rose to his feet.

Conscript Fathers,

The business at hand is brought before us by the elected Consul. I know that Senator Lucretius Tricipitinus served dutifully in executing the governorship of Sicily, and his handling of finances is well known, he would surely be an excellent pick for the position. Likewise Senator Silvius Pastor is an honorable Roman, who I know would dutifully fufill the duty of colonization. Having just recently returned from the successful campaign in the region, I know it to be a bountiful land well earned by our veterans to bring ever greater glory to Mother Rome. Therefore I vote

Aye
crustyrustyaphid
Formerly Kaiser und König Franz Ferdinand I
Formerly Major General Don Carlos Buell
Formerly King Carol I
User avatar
Marcus Silvius Pastor
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 7:27 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Marcus Silvius Pastor »

Marcus Aurelius Cotta wrote: Sun Dec 19, 2021 4:55 pm WHEREAS the Gallic barbarians have betrayed The Senate and People of Rome in the past,

WHEREAS Roman soldiers have performed heroic tasks in the recent campaign against the Boii and have earned a right to settle new lands,

And WHEREAS Rome requires rapid transportation to defend her allies and colonies,

The Senate of Rome enacts as follows:

1. Consul Decius Bellicus shall be tasked with concluding the pacification of the Boii and the Insubres for the Consular year 559 AUC. A separate supply motion for funding the legions in the year shall follow.

2. Hostus Lucretius Tricipitinus shall oversee the construction of a new highway to the Po Valley of a total distance, in feet, circa 876,000, which would originate an expenditure of 6,132,000 Denarii. Hostus shall receive funding for a year of operations, at 1,022,000 d to carry out his task.

3. Marcus Silvius Pastor shall oversee the establishment of two coloniae of 1,500 veterans each, and shall receive authorization for funding of 945,000 d to carry out this task.
I am both humbled and honored by the confidence shown in my by the Consul and the words spoken by Senator C. Quinctilius Varus on my behalf. I look forward to working closely with Consul M. Decius Bellicus and Senator Hostus Lucretius Tricipitinus for the continued glory and honor of Rome, by doing my part in organizing the settlement of proud Roman veterans in both Bononia and Mutina.

Aye.
User avatar
Proculus Lucius Regulus
Posts: 147
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 6:25 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Proculus Lucius Regulus »

Lucius Regulus's proxy glared daggers at F. Pavo's proxy. The insolence, in his mind, was unforgivable, let alone the breach of decorum.

"If part of the highway project contains first a survey conducted by L. Tricipitinus, I support the legislation. Aye."
Last edited by Proculus Lucius Regulus on Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Starfish, but you could probably already tell from the stupid shit I've written above this signature
TerranSteel
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 9:24 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by TerranSteel »

Nay.
TerranSteel

Formerly played:
COO 1900 - French Republic
User avatar
Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo Hispanicus
Posts: 511
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 4:02 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo Hispanicus »

Because this vote was called without discourse or nomination of the mentioned individuals, I vote nay.
User avatar
Marcus Decius Bellicus
Posts: 1128
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:44 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Marcus Decius Bellicus »

Decius Bellicus rises

“Censor, perhaps a reminder that all are required to be afforded the right to speak before a vote can be had is in order.”
He is a proconsul of Rome.
Marcus Aurelius Cotta
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:13 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Marcus Aurelius Cotta »

Marcus Decius Bellicus wrote: Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:33 pm Decius Bellicus rises

“Censor, perhaps a reminder that all are required to be afforded the right to speak before a vote can be had is in order.”
This is an extension of the debate from yesterday, many have already spoken. The vote is underway.
He is a Consul of Rome
User avatar
Marcus Decius Bellicus
Posts: 1128
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 7:44 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Marcus Decius Bellicus »

Consul Cotta,

That is not how the government works, you should know this. It is an ill omen that you would seek to spit on the legacy of the Republic in this way. Clearly enough debate has not been had when there are debates happening during the vote you called on your own mere moments after submitting your motion.

Enough is enough, Aurelius Cotta.
He is a proconsul of Rome.
Marcus Aurelius Cotta
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2019 8:13 pm

Re: Curia Session III 195 B.C. / 559 AUC

Post by Marcus Aurelius Cotta »

Marcus Decius Bellicus wrote: Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:47 pm Consul Cotta,

That is not how the government works, you should know this. It is an ill omen that you would seek to spit on the legacy of the Republic in this way. Clearly enough debate has not been had when there are debates happening during the vote you called on your own mere moments after submitting your motion.

Enough is enough, Aurelius Cotta.
The vote is underway, cast aye or nay.
He is a Consul of Rome
Locked