Page 5 of 6
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:06 am
by TerranSteel
Aye.
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:10 am
by Gaius Quinctilius Varus
Nay
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:18 am
by Hostus Lucretius Tricipitinus
Aye
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:25 am
by Gaius Cassius Vecellinus
Abstain.
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:31 am
by Marcus Decius Bellicus
Aye
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 11:37 am
by Allectus Fabius Maximus
Aye
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 12:43 pm
by Marcus Silvius Pastor
The award of Agnomen to individuals - whatever their station in life may be - for accomplishments attributable to the diligent work of multiple Roman Magistrates over the period of years is unfounded in our Mother Republic. Never before has it been done and this body has not previously seen fit to so harshly depart from its precedent. However deserving these sitting Consuls are of their respective Triumphs, I am obligated to vote NAY on the amalgamated matter at-hand - as their individual accomplishments do not rise to the established level of our traditions for the award of Agnomen.
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 3:27 pm
by Proculus Lucius Regulus
Nay. Generals who beat up on uncivilized barbarians with the best troops in the world do not deserve large triumphs and agnomen. Medium triumphs have sufficed for much greater victories. I would suggest my colleagues show some humility instead of trying to grab more glory for themselves.
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 3:37 pm
by Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo Hispanicus
Aye.
Re: Curia Session III - 193BC
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:21 pm
by Gaius Claudius Nero Liguricus
Aye.